Friday, March 2, 2007

The Suffering God?

In my systematic theology class last week, we had a rousing discussion about theopachism. This topic arose during my presentation of the two natures of Christ and the communicatio idiomatum (communication of attributes.).

The Lutheran Confessions clearly affirm that "the Son of God suffered" because of the communication of attributes; yet at the same time, is reticent to speak of divine suffering. Because of the hypostatic union, "not only the bare human nature (which possesses the characteristics of suffering and dying) suffered for the sins of the entire world, but the Son of God himself suffered (according to the assumed human nature) and, according to our simple Christian creed, truly died--though the divine nature can neither suffer nor die" (The Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, Article VIII).

Since the mid-twentieth century, however, a whole spate of theologians--Catholic and Protestant--have reconsidered the traditional teaching of the impassibility of God and affirmed theopaschism. In an article entitled, "The Suffering of God: A New Orthodoxy," Ronald Goetz remarked that after the atrocities of World War II, "talk about an impassible, immutable God was for many simply inconceivable. How could God be love and not lay wounded on the battlefields of France? Only a God who suffered with the victims of the war could speak to the disillusionments created by the war."

A counter-perspective was recently offered by Thomas Weinandy in "Does God Suffer?" Weinandy thinks this "new orthodoxy" leads down a dangerous road theologically. He states that while "we may intellectually grapple with the mystery of God in the midst of our suffering," theologians must resist the idea of theopachism and reaffirm God's impassibility. He writes,

In the Church’s most important public task of communicating the gospel, speaking of the God who does not suffer as we suffer may go against the cultural grain, but such is the God of Scripture and normative Christian tradition. As I have tried to show, the truth that God does not suffer is at the heart of the gospel, making it truly good news. This is especially in contrast to the bad news, which has become something like a “new orthodoxy,” that God is in as much trouble as we are.
I admit that my own perspective has been shaped more by perspective of the "new orthodoxy," but I also believe that Weinandy's concern warrants some serious reflection and response. Though written well before Weinandy's piece, Richard Bauckham (a Moltmann disciple) offers these intial thoughts in response to the kind of concerns that Weinandy raises. In "Only the Suffering God Can Help: Divine Passibility in Modern Theology," Bauckham writes:

It seems increasingly obvious that the Greek philosophical inheritance in traditional theology was adopted without the necessary critical effect of the central Christian insight into the divine nature: the love of God revealed in the cross of Christ. For the Greeks, suffering implied deficiency of being, weakness, subjection, instability. But the cross shows us a God who suffers out of the fullness of his being because he is love. He does not suffer against his will, but willingly undertakes to suffer with and for those he loves. His suffering does not deflect him from his purpose, but accomplishes his purpose. His transcendence does not keep him aloof from the world, but as transcendent love appears in the depth of his self-sacrificing involvement in the world. Finally, if Christians know anything about God from the cross, it is that 'the weakness of God is stronger than men' (1 Cor. 1:25). The cross does not make God a helpless victim of evil, but is the secret of his power and his triumph over evil. This is why 'only the suffering God can help.'

10 comments:

Kevan D Penvose said...

I actaully have less to say now as I thought I would when I was half way through your post, thanks to your contribution of Baukham's quote at the end. In doing theology, we have to identify what presuppositions we bring when we speak the term 'god'. Do we automatically assign certain attributes to define 'god', usually from Greek philosophy? Or do we determine the definition of 'god' by following the narrative of the Hebrew scriptures leading up to God acting definitively through Jesus to bring about the kingdom of God on earth? I go with an approach indebted to Robert Jenson: 'god' is whoever raised Jesus -- Israel's messiah and therefore also the world's savior -- from the dead.

christian scharen said...

Hi, Cheryl.
Chris Scharen here.
I wrote a book on u2 and theology of the cross. This question of god's suffering came up, and I really sided with the Moltmann school on this. I quote this:

To recognize God in the crucified Christ means to grasp the Trinitarian history of God and to understand oneself and this whole world with Auschwitz and Viet Nam, with race hatred and hunger, as existing in the history of God. god is not dead, death is in God. God suffers by us. God suffers with us. Suffering is in God.

(From Moltmann, Theology Today 1972)

I worry quite a bit about the negative legacy of the early marriage between patristic theology and Greek philosophy. This debate seems an example where, as Kevan says, a good dose of the Hebrew Scriptures goes a long way.

It would be fun to be a fly on the wall for the conversation . . .

Anonymous said...

It's remarkable for me to have a web page, which is beneficial in support of my experience. thanks admin

Visit my blog - how to file for bankruptcy in florida

Anonymous said...

You can set up a schedule and easily get your child to comply.
I really can't say that we followed the method completely,
though, because I really don't know much about it. If there is a lot of stress or chaos going on in your home, don't try
the 3 day method of potty training.

my webpage: how to go potty

Anonymous said...

Like all warts, they are harmless growths which will probably go away by themselves or with minimal treatment,
but their location and the amount of pain involved makes
them difficult to ignore. Users of plant medicine experience
rapid elimination of genital warts without scarring or recurrence.

If you can keep your immune system running on high, then chances
are that you can keep warts from forming.

Also visit my homepage: wartrol review

Anonymous said...

Wow, this article is nice, my younger sister is analyzing these kinds of
things, so I am going to inform her.

my weblog :: http://www.examiner.com/

Anonymous said...

Simply desire to say your article is as astounding.
The clearness to your put up is just excellent and i can think you are knowledgeable
on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to seize your feed to stay updated with impending post.
Thank you a million and please keep up the rewarding work.


Here is my web blog: buy gold Bar

Anonymous said...

As individuals, it's really simple to experience something new.
The skill of the indispensable elements you'll need
to install the air sending the rest of versions which are available on one
side needs leveling. The game will be based on download call of duty advanced warfare sports, adventure, shooting, mind reader and many more.
Are you committing any of your hand on one side needs download call of duty advanced warfare leveling.
The fact that millions download call of duty advanced warfare of fans around the
globe.

Have a look at my web blog - download call of duty advanced warfare dedicated server

thidaph said...

the original source Goyard Dolabuy check my reference www.dolabuy.co you could try this out https://www.dolabuy.ru/

Anonymous said...

goyard bag
alexander mcqueen shoes
kyrie 7
moncler
kyrie 7
off white hoodie
supreme t shirt
goyard
a bathing ape
yeezy boost 350 v2